mollymeek ([info]mollymeek) wrote,
@ 2008-12-10 23:31:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
The 3 Tenets of Great Governance

Molly believes that she has stumbled upon the art of great governance and leadership. But she’s going to need everyone’s help to help her come up with more examples (from none other than the world’s most capable leaders) than she can provide below. Molly is very bimbotic, so her memory isn’t very good, especially when the examples seem countless. So if you can provide examples, please leave a comment.

There are probably a number of habits of Great Leaders that I shall attempt to place under my 3 tenets.

1. Talk big

Great leaders must have vision. It is not good vision that counts. Sometimes hallucinations work very well too. But what is most important is to announce your hallucinatory adventures to the people under your leadership.

You must be able to foresee the future—or at least create the myth that you are able to by speaking like a clairvoyant when you actually have a secret team of uncredited statisticians, economists and scholars doing the research for you—and say something unique about the present. How you say it is very important. The difference between a charismatic leader and an uninspiring leader lies in the ability to use language to generate an aura of mystique. Say something like, “We are entering the Stone Age” instead of a boring “Trust me, things are going very well”, which would sound like you are on your way to damnation for violating the ninth commandment one time too many.

Repetition is of utmost importance too. The best leaders in the world seem to be those who are able to make the same promise for decades, which is in turn predicated on the constant skillful deferment of the fulfillment of the promise. In other words, promise a gift. But do not give the gift for you will be rendered obsolete the moment the exchange is completed with a merciless “Thank you.” As you can see, the most highly paid political leaders (and therefore the best) have been promising things like openness, help for the poor, help for the middle-class, transparency, accountability, etc.

Of course, the paradox is that you cannot constantly promise to give something without giving anything. There is a way to deal with this problem. You can claim that the gift has already been given and promise to give an even better version of it. For example: “You want freedom? I give you freedom. . . . What? You want a different kind of freedom? OK, but you need to wait.” Another example: “I am accountable and transparent. I am accountable and transparent. I am accountable and transparent. I am accountable and transparent. I AM accountable and transparent . . . .” Or, “I’m a good leader” (X 100, 24/7); “This is a democratic and free country” (X100, 24/7). Repetition doesn’t make something come true, but it has the power to make people believe it is true. And you know that in the recipe of governance, faith gives you more mileage than truth, which is simply a dispensable ingredient.

 

2. Do it your way

Yes, contrary to popular belief, good governance is not a matter of doing what you are supposed to do or told to do. Good governance is a matter of doing what you think is best. When alternatives are proposed, you must know how to reject them. Be dismissive. Do not even attempt to explain why you are rejecting ideas. Just say, “. . . is not the solution” or “. . . is not the way to go”. Even when it comes to requests for you or your fellow leaders to step down, just be authoritatively dismissive and use the stock replies given. People will be convinced.

“Cut GST? That’s not the solution.” “Welfare? Minimum wage? That doesn’t solve the problem.” “Western democracy is not the way to go.” “Sack him? But he’s not the problem.”

One further step ingenious leaders take is to dismissive alternatives AND cleverly emphasize how good your own way is, even if it's pure fluff that's as useless as the alternatives provided for you. This is related to the art of self-mystification, but that should be left for another blog post. Say something that goes along the lines of “My solution is THE solution.” without explaining why.

Say, “Singapore has created a unique brand of tripartism that functions very well.”

Or, "To prevent retrenchment, we need employers to love their employees. But one cannot love to order, so we can't force employers to keep workers when employers want to retrench them.. But we can tell employers to love their employees by moulding employees into the perfect worker who will not form unions against their employers." Again, you are the guru. Don’t bother to explain.

(Maybe I will give a prize for the first person to spot the quote that is actually lifted from what a politician says.) 

3. Side with your followers

This is the trickiest. Initially, it might seem to contradict the first two rules, but rest assured that it doesn’t. Perhaps Molly should qualify the rule: Appear to side with your followers at your convenience.

It is clear that your followers have to think that you are on their side. Otherwise, even the stupidest follower will not follow you. So even though you might not always be on their side, it is imperative to give the impression that you are. Bimbos and himbos, the parable of the husband who wanted a few concubines:

There was once a husband who grew tired of his wife and was afraid that she would become too domineering over time. He decided to kill two birds with one stone by having a few concubines. His wife initially objected, but he told tell her, “But I assure you, you will always be the First.” He also said, “They will help you manage the household and lighten your burdens” even though he was thinking, “They give better sex and with them to threaten your position in the household, you will behave yourself.” The wife agreed. She had to.

 

If you are aspiring to be a great political leader, don’t forget Molly’s 3 Tenets of Great Governance. Molly’s simple tips could help you earn up to a few million dollars a year.

Provided that you are in the right country, with the right people, of course.

 

Post partly inspired by news article such as, Labour chief says legislation to stop retrenchments is not the solution

SINGAPORE : There have been calls to give Singapore's labour movement more teeth and power to stop retrenchments, but labour chief Lim Swee Say believes that legislation is not the solution. 

Speaking in an interview on Channel NewsAsia's "Insight" programme, he said the best way to deal with the current economic downturn is to strengthen the spirit of tripartism. 

Small and medium enterprise Lian Ying Industries Engineering has been in the precision engineering business for nearly 30 years. 

It has never retrenched any worker. In fact, its workers are regularly sent for training. 

Koh Maw Sheng, managing director, Lian Ying Industries Engineering, said: "It is important to improve our workers skills, education as well as company image. We want to show our customers that our workers are professionally trained and certified." 

A key programme that will help achieve higher training skills is the S$600 million Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience (SPUR). 

The Workforce Development Agency (WDA) said it is encouraged by Singaporeans' response to calls to raise their skills through training during the economic downturn. 

Since SPUR was announced, it has received close to 500 enquiries from both companies and workers about the programme. 

WDA's website also saw a 40 per cent increase in number of hits or approximately 200,000 hits on November 21 - the day SPUR was announced. 

In addition, WDA's partners such as NTUC, SNEF and the Community Development Councils have also received enquiries. 

Companies and workers want to know the types of skills training programmes available under SPUR at Continuing Education and Training centres islandwide, and how they can tap on the programme. 

And Singapore's labour movement believes that for SPUR to be effective, employers must adopt the mindset of turning excess manpower into investments. 

Lim Swee Say, Secretary-General, NTUC, said: "Our slogan is 'upturn the downturn'. In other words, we believe that while everybody is focused on the downside of the downturn, we as the labour movement, look at the upside of the downturn, because we believe that the downturn presents the same challenge to every companies, to every economy in this world, yet at the same time it will draw different responses. 

"In the case of Singapore, the partnership, our ability to work together as government, as employers, as labour movement, is our biggest strength and unique capability." 

The labour movement added that it will work with companies to restructure their operations. 

Mr Lim said: "Our concern is that if every organisation takes retrenchment too lightly (and) as the first resort, as the first action, takes it as a way to cut costs...this could lead to massive retrenchment, and this could lead to a very rapid rise in unemployment. I think that is our concern, because we are already seeing that." 

Mr Lim feels such situations can be avoided with effective tripartism. 

He elaborated: "If tripartism can be achieved through legislation, every country by today will have the law in place, every country will have a competitive, effective tripartism, then Singapore will be no different from any other country. But tripartism cannot be achieved through legislation alone; care and trust cannot be achieved through legislation. 

"And as a result, Singapore - after all these years of concerted effort by the government, by the labour movement, by the employers - has created this unique brand of tripartism in Singapore, something that functions very well. So in good times, tripartism must be effective; in bad times, tripartism must be even more effective. 

"So yes, as we go through this downturn, there will be tensions, disagreements (and) friction, but we should never look for an easy way out, because any easy way out could turn into confrontation, so that is why on the part of the labour movement, we are very realistic. 

"We continue to work on the ground, to engage with the management, workers (and) the government, because at the end of the day, the only way that we can ensure that our tripartism in Singapore will remain our unique strength...(is) only through communication, consensus (and) the continuous process of trust and building." - AFP/ms 

Viewers can catch Lim Swee Say's interview on Insight on Thursday at 8.30pm on Channel NewsAsia




(Post a new comment)


[info]mottledquailegg
2008-12-11 04:47 am UTC (link)
It is clear that your followers have to think that you are on their side. Otherwise, even the stupidest follower will not follow you. So even though you might not always be on their side, it is imperative to give the impression that you are.

Actually, not necessarily through. I'm thinking Stockholm syndrome and Gramscian hegemony. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-11 05:15 am UTC (link)
True. I guess the idea is to give the impression that you and your followers are on the same side. If you are not on their side, they had better be on yours.

As far as my limited knowledge of the Stockholm Syndrome goes though, it works with hostages and hostages are like bargaining chips. In the local context, people aren't like hostages because no one wants to redeem them. So I guess Gramsci is more useful here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

My Guess and Suggestion
[info]informationreadbyme.blogspot.com
2008-12-11 08:59 am UTC (link)
(Maybe I will give a prize for the first person to spot the quote that is actually lifted from what a politician says.)

"moulding employees into the perfect worker"

Did i get it right?


A additional suggestion? Never admit your faults? Becoz it would undermine the confidence of the pple.

PS: Is there anyway to subscribe to comments?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: My Guess and Suggestion
[info]mollymeek
2008-12-11 09:23 am UTC (link)
Haha, no. It's “Singapore has created a unique brand of tripartism that functions very well" with a few words taken away. You can find that in the news article pasted:

"And as a result, Singapore - after all these years of concerted effort by the government, by the labour movement, by the employers - has created this unique brand of tripartism in Singapore, something that functions very well. So in good times, tripartism must be effective; in bad times, tripartism must be even more effective."

(Effective in what?)

Never admitting your faults is just normal. Even kids can do that. To be an exceptional leader, you have to go beyond that and not even see your faults as faults, or if you do see a fault, it's someone else's. (E.g. if there's complacency, it's got to be your sidekick being complacent.) It is only when you have the confidence of your perfection plus the humility to pretend that you don't (plus the ability to brush of any failures as the inevitable condition of being human) that makes you a great leader.

The only way to subscribe to comments, I think, is to comment with a livejournal account and you can choose to get comments sent to you via email, something like how you do it with Blogger and a Google account.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-12-11 11:04 am UTC (link)
Another great article Molly. I'm glad you've come out from your play pen. I love reading your articles which is a real change for the propaganda on the ST. But hey, from the way you write, you gotta be a journalist in your day job. Hehz.

I hope aspiring young PSC scholars are reading your 3 tenets if they want to make it big in 30 years. haha.

On another note, I can't stand that bugger Lim Swee Say... He doesn't talk sense at all. Why we have such a person representing the workers is confounding to me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-11 11:33 am UTC (link)
Thanks. What is it about the way I write that makes me "journalistic"?

Oh, come on. Give Lim a break. It's not as if he's making less sense than his equally or even more well-paid colleagues.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-12-11 09:49 pm UTC (link)
I would like to give him a break. But the way he speaks... I'm not too sure if he's purposely speaking Singlish to get himself to the "peasant" level or he actually speaks like that. But I would wish he just speak normally.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-12 02:20 am UTC (link)
I was being ironic.

I thought you would wish he wouldn't speak at all.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-12-12 04:40 am UTC (link)
Haha. Wasn't thinking.

That's impossible. They have to speak after getting their millions... Pay some kind of lip service.
Just wish they speak something sensible sometimes..

We can only Hope or Quit. Either way I guess... I'm enjoying my time in the Bay Area in the meantime.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-12 05:10 am UTC (link)
I can only hope to quit. :(

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-12-11 04:11 pm UTC (link)
If only there is a journalist in MSM that writes with such reasoning power, it(MSM) would have won much credibility.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-11 04:42 pm UTC (link)
That would depend on whether they are allowed to use their reasoning in their articles. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-12-11 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Bow to the pope.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mollymeek
2008-12-11 03:12 pm UTC (link)
Where's the Pope?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…