| mollymeek ( @ 2008-07-16 14:51:00 |
Charged for Possessing Uncertified Films?
First, I was wondering how this case of possessing obscene films is linked to the Ren Ci probe. (It isn't.) Then something that makes one wonder what the guy was being charged with.
Having films uncertified for screening? (That reminds me of the One Nation Under Lee case.) What's wrong with having films uncertified for screening? I just made a home video of a bimbotic cat chasing two white mice. Sssshh.... It's not certified. Better go delete it.
[On a different note, (how) does Singapore law differentiate between "obscenity" and "pornography"? What exactly constitutes obscenity? Sorry hah, Molly neber study Law one.]
-----------
Is it just me or is everyone else getting a lot of spam comments from spam LJ accounts lately? :(
First, I was wondering how this case of possessing obscene films is linked to the Ren Ci probe. (It isn't.) Then something that makes one wonder what the guy was being charged with.
"He faces six charges - four for possessing obscene films and two for having films uncertified for screening - and may be fined and jailed if found guilty."
Having films uncertified for screening? (That reminds me of the One Nation Under Lee case.) What's wrong with having films uncertified for screening? I just made a home video of a bimbotic cat chasing two white mice. Sssshh.... It's not certified. Better go delete it.
[On a different note, (how) does Singapore law differentiate between "obscenity" and "pornography"? What exactly constitutes obscenity? Sorry hah, Molly neber study Law one.]
-----------
Is it just me or is everyone else getting a lot of spam comments from spam LJ accounts lately? :(