mollymeek ([info]mollymeek) wrote,
@ 2007-06-09 00:04:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
A Tale of Two Bankrupts
Once upon a time, there was a bankrupt by the name of Dr. Chee Soon Juan. As Dr. Chee was a bankrupt, he had to get the permission from the Official Assignee before he is allowed to leave the country. (In a way, he wasn't any less free than other men in his country who had to seek the permission of a weaponry-loaded organization prior to leaving the country.) When the Official Assignee did not reply to Dr. Chee's applications, Dr. Chee decided to try to leave the country anyway. Thanks to vigilant immigration officers, Dr. Chee was caught when he was attempting to leave the country. He was subsequently jailed.

Once upon roughly the same time, there was a bankrupt by the name of Mr. Yong. (It was rumored that Mr. Yong might not be altogether that broke, but no one could be sure.) Like Dr. Chee, Mr. Yong was not supposed to leave the country. But unlike Dr. Chee, he managed to leave the country despite the proven track record of the vigilance of the immigration officers. (Incidentally, a particular group of people in that country happened to be very proud this thing called a proven track record, something it claims to have.) Unlike in the case of Dr. Chee, the public had a stake in Mr. Yong's case obecause he could be owing a charity the money donated from the public.

The said country is a free country where people are not persecuted simply for engaging in the wrong sort of politics. Unlike in frightening regimes where the entire state machinery could be utilized to crush certain people for threatening the powers that be, the said country is free, democratic and entirely transparent. As such, it wouldn't have had been more important for the authorities to go all out to clamp down on an errant politician than to pay attention a bankrupt in whom the public is highly interested.

But perhaps it is precisely because there is so much transparency and freedom in the country that even Mr. Yong had become transparent and managed to slip past the Immigration officers.



(16 comments) - (Post a new comment)

The OA reply
(Anonymous)
2007-06-09 05:16 am UTC (link)
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/280309/1/.html

The reply from OA is so nicely co-ordinated to match the getaway. The answers are so happened to perfectly explain the time line of getaway.

This is the best part:
Yong now has until June 12 to submit his Statement of Affairs. If not, the OA may apply for a warrant of arrest.
Come on, you mean that he is going to an overseas internet cafe and send the statement via his Yahoo account. And if he does not, the OA MAY want to arrest him.

For heaven's sake, he is gone for sure. The OA may talk all they want, please do not "may this or may that" anymore.

Just do it and BE FAIR!!!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: The OA reply
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-09 08:56 am UTC (link)
So:

16 May: Yong declared bankrupt

17 May (early hours): Yong left

17 May (working hours): NKF lawyers had to inform OA who then informs ICA

If bankrupts are categorically not allowed to leave the country without permission, why does the OA have to inform ICA? After all, any bankrupt without permission should not be allowed to leave.

If a bankrupt can leave just because the OA didn't ask ICA to blacklist him, can we assume that the ICA was instructed to blacklist Dr. Chee - even before the OA denied Dr. Chee permission to leave?

And why was Dr. Chee promptly arrested (for just attempting to leave when he didn't know if permission was granted) whereas the OA may not even apply for a warrant of arrest for Yong? And why is Yong given such a long time to submit his Statement of Affairs when Dr. Chee was promptly arrested?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: The OA reply
(Anonymous)
2007-06-09 02:47 pm UTC (link)
Dear Molly,

For Yong, there is the standard red tape.
For Chee, there is no red tape.

Politically motivated people have their special privileges. It is like a credit card, don't leave home with it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: The OA reply
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-10 03:30 pm UTC (link)
I hope I don't have this particular credit card. Interest rates too high.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Proven Track Record!!
(Anonymous)
2007-06-09 05:17 am UTC (link)
You missed out how vigilant the immigration folks were when they even managed to stop a guy (Gomez) who made a mistake in filling forms from going back to where he worked!! :) Didn't even owe anybody any money yet!

THAT's efficiency ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Proven Track Record!!
(Anonymous)
2007-06-09 05:32 am UTC (link)
You have forgotten about those who have slipped through the causeway by walking. So, it is really true, there are real ninjas in the world. I'm not talking about the white ninjas.

No wonder the ICA folks cannot see them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Proven Track Record!!
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-09 08:58 am UTC (link)
Transparent mah.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Proven Track Record!!
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-09 08:57 am UTC (link)
Maybe the primary task of all our state agencies is to ensure the political hegemony of a group of people?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Singapore fugitives in JB
(Anonymous)
2007-06-10 04:37 am UTC (link)
Yong is not the first one to have fled from Singapore to JB and he won't be the last one.

http://sophiesworld-sophiesworld.blogspot.com/2007/06/singapore-fugitives-in-jb.html

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Singapore fugitives in JB
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-10 03:27 pm UTC (link)
Maybe there are 3 million people thinking of doing the same thing?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

3rd world OA
(Anonymous)
2007-06-10 10:50 am UTC (link)
Things like this reminds us not every govt agency is 1st world in Singapore. There can be a "temporary" 3rd world lapse in performance.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: 3rd world OA
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-10 03:28 pm UTC (link)
Maybe there are some people who are not paid top dollars and hence are the top talents?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

A KPI for Immigration
(Anonymous)
2007-06-10 02:43 pm UTC (link)
That's it, they should make this a KPI for Immigration.

Spotting people that matter is a good indicator. So is someone's head going to roll? I think not. Chee got spotted. They are sharp.

In the unlikely event of officials coming out to address the perplexed citizens on the issue, we would be able to put a face to the deed.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: A KPI for Immigration
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-10 03:29 pm UTC (link)
Maybe they get a ten-month performance bonus for spotting seditious opposition politicians already?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: A KPI for Immigration
(Anonymous)
2007-06-10 03:34 pm UTC (link)
Any rewards for missing a freshly-declared-bankrupt?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: A KPI for Immigration
[info]mollymeek
2007-06-10 04:16 pm UTC (link)
Don't think so, but it must be an honest mistake.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(16 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…